Comparison of Mobile Phone Standards

CellularService .org
Home Service | Phones I Accessories | Blackberries | Air Cards I Cell Phones | Reference Center | Wireless News | Software | Computers
Shop for Sprint Service Shop for Cellular Service  

Wireless News Go to Wireless News Center
Message Boards Go to Wireless Message Boards

Comparison of mobile phone standards

Global System for Mobile Communications (AKA GSM, around 80–85 % market share) and IS-95 (AKA cdmaOne, around 10–15 % market share[1]) are the two most prevalent mobile communication technologies. Both technologies have to solve the same problem: to divide the finite RF spectrum among multiple users.

TDMA (Time Division Multiple Access—underlying technology used in GSM's 2G) does it by chopping up the channel into sequential time slices. Each user of the channel takes turns to transmit and receive signals. In reality, only one person is actually using the channel at a specific moment. This is analogous to time-sharing on a large computer server.

CDMA (Code Division Multiple Access—underlying technology used in GSM's 3G and IS-95's 2G) on the other hand, uses a special type of digital modulation called spread spectrum which spreads the voice data over a very wide channel in pseudorandom fashion. The receiver undoes the randomization to collect the bits together and produce the sound.
For comparison, imagine a cocktail party, where couples are talking to each other in a single room. The room represents the available bandwidth. In GSM, a speaker takes turns talking to a listener. The speaker talks for a short time and then stops to let another pair talk. There is never more than one speaker talking in the room, no one has to worry about two conversations mixing. In CDMA, any speaker can talk at any time; however each uses a different language. Each listener can only understand the language of their partner. As more and more couples talk, the background noise (representing the noise floor) gets louder, but because of the difference in languages, conversations do not mix.

Comparison table

Feature NMT GSM UMTS IS-95 CDMA2000
Technology FDMA TDMA W-CDMA CDMA CDMA
Generation 1G 2G 3G 2G 3G
Digital No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Year of First Use 1981 1991 2001 1995 2000
Worldwide market share[2] 0% 80% 4% 0.6% 12%
Roaming Scandinavia Worldwide, 200+ countries Worldwide Limited Limited
Handset interoperability None SIM card SIM card None RUIM (not commonly implemented)
Operator locking  ? Unlockable Unlockable ESN ESN
Common Interference None Interferes with some electronics, such as amplifiers None None None
Signal quality/coverage area Good coverage due to low frequencies Good coverage indoors on 850/900 MHz. Repeaters possible. 35 km hard limit. Smaller cells and lower indoors coverage due to 2100 MHz frequency Unlimited cell size, low transmitter power permits large cells Unlimited cell size, low transmitter power permits large cells
Frequency utilization/Call density Very low density 0.2 MHz = 8 timeslots. Each timeslot can hold up to 2 calls through interleaving. 5 MHz = 2 Mbit/s. Each call uses 1.8-12 kbit/s depending on chosen quality and audio complexity.  ? Comparable to UMTS  ? Comparable to UMTS
Battery life Low, due to high transmitter power (1 watt) Very good due to simple protocol, good coverage and mature, power-efficient chipsets. Lower due to high demands of WCDMA power control and young chipsets. Lower due to high demands of CDMA power control. Lower due to high demands of CDMA power control and young chipsets.
Handoff Hard Hard Soft Soft Soft
Breathing No No Yes Yes Yes
Intellectual property  ? Concentrated among a few industry participants Concentrated among a few industry participants Qualcomm Qualcomm